Marcellus takes a second look at library, sort of

The latest town hall proposal was defeated more than two months ago, but the Marcellus Town Board is far from done solving the myriad problems with the current facility.

The board voted 3-2 last Monday to allow VIP Structures to begin studying the first-priority fixes at town hall.

The lack of a second-floor emergency exit suitable to the NYS Dept. of Labor regulations and upgrades to three entrance ways and one doorway inside the building are of top concern, while the overall flow of traffic and other design and accommodation issues were prioritized with less urgency.

In the meantime, the town is still on the fence with the village's offer to renovate the old library building on Slocombe Avenue into a "new" town hall.

In a letter dated April 23, Town Supervisor Dan Ross formally turned down the village's offer, citing numerous reasons the library would be unfit as a town hall, regardless of renovation.

Ross pointed to a lack of square footage, parking, handicapped accessibility and air conditioning, an aging heating system and roof and design problems as some of the town's reasons for declining the village's offer.

In his letter Ross stated the board had based it's decision on the conceptual drawings by Lake Architecture. The board has in the past slammed the design firm for basing those plans on specs for the proposed town hall design that failed to gain voter approval in March, without consulting the town.

During a meeting of town and village officials in April, Mayor Mike Plochocki had reminded the town board that the Lake Architectural designs had been commissioned by the village for the sole purpose of determining whether or not the town's needs could be met with the space available in the former library building.

But on Monday May 11, Marcellus town justices and officials took a walk through the building to see whether it might be suitable for the court department.

Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment